Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Alzheimer's and Dementia ; 18(S8) (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2172403

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had disproportionate effects on the health and well-being of older adults. Little is known about the effects of isolation and social distancing measures on the mental health of older adults with cognitive impairment. Method(s): 194 participants from the Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) Clinical Core cohort adjudicated as cognitively normal (CN, n = 129), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 65) were given questionnaires cross-sectionally measuring loneliness, perceived stress, well-being, and coping style. We created multivariable regression models (adjusted for age, sex, race, and education) to assess relationships among dependent variables, loneliness and perceived stress, and independent variables of interest, well-being and coping style (Table 2). Result(s): Overall, the mean age was 72+/-8 years. Table 1 lists baseline demographic and study measures for CN and MCI groups. Table 2 shows associations between dependent variables (perceived stress, loneliness) and independent variables of interest. Participants with MCI had significantly higher levels of loneliness (B = 3.30;p = 0.03) than CN participants. Participants who reported lower eudaimonic and hedonic well-being had higher levels of perceived stress and loneliness (p < 0.01), and those who endorsed using self-blame and behavioral disengagement to cope with stress had higher perceived stress (B = 3.06, = < 0.01) and loneliness (B = 7.84, p < 0.01). There was no interaction by cognitive diagnosis. Conclusion(s): Participants with MCI had higher levels of loneliness, but not perceived stress, than those with normal cognition. We found that participants expressing high feelings of well-being had significantly lower, and participants reporting a coping style with self-blame and behavioral disengagement had significantly higher perceived stress and loneliness. Next steps involve exploring associations of neuroimaging and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers with perceived stress and loneliness and evaluating transcriptional measures of stress measured concurrently. Copyright © 2022 the Alzheimer's Association.

2.
Public Health ; 199: 17-19, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1404817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among pregnant women in the Scottish population during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective national serosurvey. METHODS: We tested 13,428 residual samples retrieved from pregnant women participating in the first trimester combined ultrasound and biochemical screening for fetal trisomy across Scotland for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over a 6-month period from November 2020 to April 2021. Seroprevalence estimates were adjusted for the sensitivity and specificity of the assays and weighted to reference populations. RESULTS: Seroprevalence rates in the antenatal samples significantly increased from 5.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7%-6.5%) in the 5-week period up to and including International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Week 51 (w/b Monday 14 December 2020) to 11.3% (95% CI 10.1%-12.6%) in the 5-week period up to and including ISO Week 14 (w/b Monday 5 April 2021). Increasing seroprevalence trends across the second wave were observed among all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: By the end of the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately one in 10 women tested around the end of the first trimester of pregnancy had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that the vast majority were still susceptible to COVID-19 as they progressed to the later stages of pregnancy, when risks from infection are elevated for both mother and baby.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Scotland/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies
3.
Public Health ; 198: 102-105, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1364418

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Studies that measure the prevalence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ('seroprevalence') are essential to understand population exposure to SARS-CoV-2 among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. We aimed to measure seroprevalence in the Scottish population over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic - from before the first recorded case in Scotland through to the second pandemic wave. STUDY DESIGN: The study design of this study is serial cross sectional. METHODS: We tested 41,477 residual samples retrieved from primary and antenatal care settings across Scotland for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over a 12-month period from December 2019-December 2020 (before rollout of COVID-19 vaccination). Five-weekly rolling seroprevalence estimates were adjusted for the sensitivity and specificity of the assays and weighted to reference populations. Temporal trends in seroprevalence estimates and weekly SARS-CoV-2 notifications were compared. RESULTS: Five-weekly rolling seroprevalence rates were 0% until the end of March, when they increased contemporaneously with the first pandemic wave. Seroprevalence rates remained stable through the summer (range: 3%-5%) during a period of social restrictions, after which they increased concurrently with the second wave, reaching 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4%-10.8%) in the week beginning 28th December in 2020. Seroprevalence rates were lower in rural vs. urban areas (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61-0.79) and among individuals aged 20-39 years and 60 years and older (AOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.86; AOR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, respectively) relative to those aged 0-19 years. CONCLUSIONS: After two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, less than one in ten individuals in the Scottish population had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Seroprevalence may underestimate the true population exposure as a result of waning antibodies among individuals who were infected early in the first wave.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Pregnancy , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Scotland/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies
5.
Public Health ; 190: 132-134, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1033173

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland has been amongst the most severe in Europe. Serological surveillance is critical to determine the overall extent of infection across populations and to inform the public health response. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of people who have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 ('seroprevalence') in the general population of Scotland and to see if this changes over time. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Between International Organization for Standardization (ISO) week 17 (i.e. week commencing 20th April) and ISO week 25 (week commencing 15 June), 4751 residual blood samples were obtained from regional biochemistry laboratories in six participating regional health authority areas covering approximately 75% of the Scottish population. Samples were tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using the LIAISON®SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay (DiaSorin, Italy). Seroprevalence rates were adjusted for the sensitivity and specificity of the assay using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: The combined adjusted seroprevalence across the study period was 4.3% (95% confidence interval: 4.2%-4.5%). The proportion varied each week between 1.9% and 6.8% with no difference in antibody positivity by age, sex or geographical area. CONCLUSIONS: At the end of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, only a small fraction of the Scottish population had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Control of COVID-19 requires the ability to detect asymptomatic and mild infections that would otherwise remain undetected through existing surveillance systems. This is important to determine the true number of infections within the general population which, in turn, can help to understand transmission, inform control measures and provide a denominator for the estimation of severity measures such as the proportion of infected people who have been hospitalised and/or have died.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Pandemics , Population Surveillance/methods , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Public Health Surveillance , Scotland/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Serologic Tests/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL